Joana Quaye, represented by law firm Dame & Partners, filed the application on May 11, 2026. In an affidavit sworn on May 12, 2026, she traces her relationship with RNAQ back to 2002, when both had just completed secondary school and paints a detailed picture of financial sacrifice and joint enterprise that she argues entitles her to a far greater share of the marital estate than the original divorce judgment awarded.
According to Joana Quaye, she dropped out of her diploma programme at what is now the University of Professional Studies, Accra (UPSA), took up multiple jobs and used her personal savings to support RNAQ’s studies and eventual travel to the United Kingdom in 2008 to pursue further education in accounting. When he returned unemployed in 2009, she claims she withdrew all her savings to provide seed capital for a micro-finance enterprise the couple founded together in 2010 — the same year they married, initially named Quick Credit, which later became Bills Micro-Credit.
She further alleges that RNAQ unlawfully removed her as both shareholder and director of the company around 2017 and 2021 respectively, without her knowledge or consent, a fact she says he admitted under cross-examination during the divorce trial.
The assets targeted by the injunction application are staggering. They include shareholding interests in Quick Credit, Quick Angels, Waterfall Engineering, Tigon Entertainment, Ridge Medical Centre, CEQA Foods and Beverages, Alcilla Farms, Coli Link Ghana and JenamGh Company Limited. Also listed are four properties — including a five-bedroom house at Trasacco Estates and homes in East Legon, Dansoman and Mamprobi, as well as a fleet of luxury vehicles comprising a Rolls Royce Phantom, Bentley Coupe, Mercedes Benz G-Wagon, Range Rover Vogue, Range Rover Velar and Lexus 4×4.
In a further bombshell, Madam Quaye alleges that RNAQ currently resides at the Trasacco property with another woman, describing her as one of several girlfriends maintained during the marriage. She also accuses RNAQ of subjecting her to severe physical violence, claiming police complaints she lodged never progressed due to alleged interference by powerful individuals acting on his behalf.
Ms. Quaye also raises serious procedural concerns about the original divorce judgment, delivered on January 20, 2026, which awarded her only one-third of a house in Dansoman and GH¢300,000 as financial settlement. She contends the full written judgment was withheld for over three months surfacing only after her constitutional right of appeal had expired, and that the court’s reasoning relied on irrelevant considerations, including references to her physical attractiveness and capacity to remarry.
The matter is scheduled for hearing at the High Court in June 2026.
